Ribble Valley 10k - Week 6 of 8

M 3 miles (7:43mm), 10 miles (7:10mm)
T 10.5 miles (7:11mm), 6 miles HA (7:33mm)
W 8 miles including 6X10s flat out hill sprints (7:26mm), 6 miles HA (7:27mm)
T 12 miles including XC Fartlek (6:18mm), 5.5 miles (7:23mm)
F 10 miles (7:44mm), 5.5 miles (7:25mm)
S 6.5 miles (HA) (6:54mm)
S 17.5 miles (6:09mm)

Total 100 miles (7:04mm)


Weight 142.8lbs
Aerobic efficiency 984 beats per mile Vs 971 beats per mile

After last week's Stockport 10 I knew I would be a bit tired so decided to run really easily for any day that wasn't a session. This is reflected in the relatively slow average pace of this week's mileage. That said I was obviously keen to pick up the mileage with the Ribble Valley race just over two weeks away.

I managed to get in a couple of sessions through the week with the first on Thursday, following a run on Wednesday with six 10s flat-out hill sprints. It was nice that this session was to be on the grass. My first XC session this season. I would like to race well at the County Champs, Northern's and National, hence why it was about time to introduce some of this stuff again.

After a good nine months of running on the road it was a bit of a shock to the system to be running hard on boggy grass. The session was 6mins, 3X2mins, 6mins, 3X2mins, 6Mins with the plan to run the 6 minute efforts around 10k effort and the 2 minutes around 5k effort. The session went well and showed that the easy running up until Thursday had helped me recover from last week's race. As a road runner it is funny when you first get back on the grass as it is just a lot slower despite the effort! I am hoping that these sessions and the forthcoming races will help toughen me up a bit! Thanks to my darling wife, Hania for the snaps!

The second session was something that I was dreading a little! I wanted to do a hilly long run with some effort. Based on last week's race and how I generally fair on hills I thought it was sensible to move away from the flat for a change for a more challenging long run. I had planned to do around 17/18 miles but with 5 laps of the local park at c Marathon effort with a couple of minutes standing recovery. The park is set on quite a sizeable hill which means the first mile is downhill and the second mile is pretty much straight up. I was questioning my sanity on the first rep as it felt so hard, even the downhill bit! The legs were like jelly after the second one so I decided I would do one more rather than the full five. I then finished the run with a three mile stretch at a steady pace (5:50s) which felt much harder than it would have had I just run the whole thing on the flat at the same pace. I did find this run very tough and I think I found it tough not because I wasn't recovered or today was a 'bad day' but simply because I tend to avoid hills wherever possible! So in retrospect I absolutely loved it as it feels like hills could be a big chink in my armoury and if I can improve it (along with my ability over the Country) then this will surely make me a better runner so come London next year I will have that strength to get me home those last few miles when it's needed most.

So one more big week, before I start easing off significantly over the following 10 days to freshen up for Ribble Valley.

As a final point I saw the results come in from the Telford 10k and it is great to see hard working athletes such as Carl Hardman (clocked his first ever sub 30 10k!) and others working their socks off to break through new barriers. I am truly excited by what is happening in the sport at the moment and take such inspiration from all athletes working as hard as they can to reach their goals.

 

Ribble Valley 10k - Week 5 of 8

M 10.5 miles (6:34mm)
T 8 miles HA (6:51mm), 6.5 miles (7:19mm)
W 9.5 miles Fartlek (5:56mm)
T 6 miles (7:16mm)
F 5 miles (6:59mm)
S 3 miles (7:22mm)
S 10 mins early AM (8:34mm), 15 miles including Stockport 10

Total 65 miles (6:37mm)
Aerobic efficiency 971 beats per mile Vs 969 beats per mile


So a reduced week of miles this week as I wanted to be a bit fresher for the Stockport 10 on Sunday. That said I still did a decent amount of volume with a good session on Wednesday before cutting the mileage significantly. In hindsight I probably didn't cut the mileage as much as I should in order to be at my freshest but Ribble Valley is the main target at the moment, and I will take a proper taper for that.


The session on Wednesday was 2X1mile, 3X1/2mile and then 8X100m strides. I did it on the treadmill as it was still pretty icy outside when I came to do the session. I felt in control but it possibly was a little too much the week of a race.


We were lucky in that we had pretty much perfect weather for Sunday's race and I felt good and ready to go despite a busy day previously with my daughter Mia's 5th birthday party. I was confident of having a go at trying to break my PB despite it being known as a tough course. Off we went and The pace was quick from the outset but it felt OK so I went with it. As we went through the first mile with me sat in fourth at 5:01 I realised that it may be a tad quick so tried to ease back a little but the legs kept going! Mark Offord joined me and we ran together (through 3 flat miles in 15:21 - not far off my 5k pace!) until five miles when he started to pull away up a big hill. As we reached the top I was really starting to struggle and my legs didn't feel that happy at all! Luckily there was still a target to focus on in the shape of Jack Nixon of Stockport who I could see was slowing a bit. I carried on working but was suddenly overtaken by Chris Arthur of Blackburn. I kept my head down and focused on trying to reel Jack in. And on a downhill stretch I managed to catch him and move straight past. From here it was just about getting to the end. There's a really testing hill between 8.5-9.2 miles which is when you least need it and although I was working hard to try and bridge the gap to Mark Offord, he was too strong for me so I decided to rein it in a little for the last bit knowing that a PB was out of the question. I crossed the line in 5th place in a time of 53:41 which considering the course was not bad especially given I almost certainly went off too quick. Sometimes it's worth it though to find out what sort of shape you're in but I will certainly be a little more conservative at the Ribble Valley.

Last 1/2 mile at Stockport. Photo credit: Alan Williams

I decided not to track my weight this week as I didn't want too many OCD distractions!  I was pleased in that I managed to continue to eat healthily and certainly felt well fuelled for the run given I moved to proportionally more carbohydrates the two days before the race. I'm conscious that I probably do need to get a bit leaner (I really notice it on the hills - but then it does help with the downhills!), but also cognisant of the fact that I need to eat enough to fuel my training. Given London is the main target I think perhaps I will just try and be a little more relaxed about my weight at the moment. I cant be super skinny all year round but will make a big effort to get to around race weight for when the specific phase starts.

This week I'll be getting back to some decent miles and all being well should go past the 4,000miles for the year on Tuesday. I also plan to get my first XC session in on Thursday, providing the legs are back to normal.

 

Ribble Valley 10k - Week 4 of 8

M 9.5 miles HA (6:49mm)
T 13.5 miles including 6X1mile (5:46mm), 5.5 miles (7:25mm)
W 6 miles (7:48mm), 9 miles HA (6:40mm)
T 10.5 miles (6:51mm), 7miles HA (7:00mm), 5.5 miles (7:25mm)
F 8.5 miles (6:02mm)
S 8.5 miles HA (7:00mm)
S 17 miles including 45 minutes acceleration run (6:02mm)

Total 100 miles
Aerobic efficiency 969 beats per mile Vs 986 beats per mile
Weight 143.1lbs Vs 142.8lbs
Body Fat 10.53% (15.06lbs) Vs 10.6% (15.14lbs)
Lean Body Mass 84.97% (121.6lbs) Vs 84.45% (120.59lbs)
Water 64.78% (92.69lbs) Vs 63.8% (91.11lbs)

This was the third week of triple figures on the bounce and I was looking forward to getting to the end of it so I could have a cut back week as I freshen up for the Stockport 10 next week. All went to plan with  a very solid session on Tuesday. Tuesday's session was 6X1mile with a half mile float. Mike had wanted me to run the miles in around 5:10 pace but keep the pace quite high on the recoveries around 6:40 pace. It went very well with the miles averaging 5:05 pace and the recoveries just under 6:30 per mile. Although I did have to stop and use the facilities at a local day care centre just after the second effort! It wouldn't have been pretty had they not taken pity on me, it was a bit like the scene from American Pie where Paul Finch gets caught short!

So it was a really good session and shows I'm in good shape albeit it did leave me feeling a little sore and my calves were very tight so I had to ditch some planned hill sprints on the Thursday to make sure I was ready for the long run on Sunday which was to be a bit of a tester. I ran moderate to easy between Tuesday and Sunday as I knew it would be a tough one.

I decided that I would use this Long run to practice with a bit of fueling, so I ensured I had a decent breakfast a couple of hours before hand and had a sports drink in the half hour before I set off. I have always done my long runs and most sessions completely fasted so it was a strange feeling to be flying out of the blocks ready to push hard. I felt myself having to hold back and the moderate hour on the roads felt very easy at 6:34 pace. I then jumped on the Treadmill for an acceleration run. I was keen to do this on the treadmill as I could control the increase in pace and not have to worry about crossing roads at pace.  The plan was to gradually accelerate for 30 minutes to finish at c10k effort and then run 10 mins easy to cool down. It went really well and the last 5 minutes of effort average 4:42 pace so probably equivalent of just sub 5:00 pace on the road. I was certainly working as you can see in the video below but I was by no means about to drop off the back!

Weight has gone up a fraction this week but body composition has improved quite a bit and I feel much happier to have carbs back in my life. This has also been reflected in an improvement in Aerobic efficiency. I will go a little lower on the carbs with it being a down week this week before going back to a more normal diet on Friday and Saturday to ensure the glycogen stores are nice and full ready for a hard blast on Sunday. Mike asked me what I'm hoping for but it's been a long time since I raced well at anything shorter than a marathon so not sure what to expect. That said I am in good shape and if conditions are good, I will be prepared to put myself in the hurt box.

Ribble Valley 10k - Week 3 of 8

M Rest
T 9.5 miles HA (6:33mm), 5 miles (7:50mm)
W 11 miles including 30 minute Tempo (5:47mm), 9 miles (6:36mm), 4.5 miles (6:43mm)
T 8 miles HA (6:44mm), 5.5 miles (7:25mm)
F 12 miles Fartlek (5:46mm), 5 miles (7:15mm)
S 8 miles HA (6:46mm), 5.5 miles (7:24mm)
S 18 miles (5:50mm)

Total 103 miles (6:31mm)
Aerobic efficiency 986 beats per mile Vs 1024 beats per mile
Weight 142.8lbs Vs 143.9lbs
Body Fat 10.6% (15.14lbs) Vs 10.65% (15.32lbs)
Lean Body Mass 84.45% (120.59lbs) Vs 84.75% (121.96lbs)
Water 63.8% (91.11lbs) Vs 64.35%(92.60lbs)


I mentioned last week that I had been utilising a low carb (c10%) diet for the previous couple of weeks and it had resulted in my running feeling a lot harder than it should. The plan was therefore to switch to a higher proportion of calories from carbs (c50%) this week. The difference was almost instantenous not just in how much easier the running felt but it was also clear that my body was much happier utilising glycogen as part of the energy supply rather than just relying on fat, which is much harder for the body to convert into energy. I was lucky that Christof Schwiening (Physiologist, Neuroscientist and Marathoner) commented on facebook after I posted last week's blog. He said the following.


'You know when the carbs are really low because the heart beats per mile go through the roof. Also, the loss of muscle glycogen and water causes a weight drop of about 1.5kg. I tried about 8 weeks of ~30km per day fuelled off just one meal a day - I was definitely in a calorific deficit. The last run of the day, before I ate, was always a struggle - usually with a heart rate about 10 beats per minute higher for the identical pace (if I could even get to it). I think this is a fairly traditional approach for some runners, and my 'gut' feeling is that it does adapt something. Although, it could just be weight loss and psychology. I am not sure that the 'speed one can maintain' is necessarily a good indication of the value of a session. Carb-depleted training does limit speed (which might inhibit some leg muscle hypertrophy), but, it also pushes adaptations elsewhere. From an evolutionary perspective I suspect that the critical selection points that good endurance running could counter were probably at times of food shortage. One might therefore expect that optimal endurance training might also require recapitulations of such stresses. I am not suggesting we should all be running for our lives, short on water and food across hot deserts whilst being chased or hunting down our food....but, that is probably the type of stress our physiology responds best to.'


From what I can gather Christof suggests that training low will produce some very positive adaptations over time in terms of weight loss and the fact that when you do finally get carbs in your system there will be a big boost to how quickly one can run at a given intensity. All that being said, I really don't know if it's for me! Running was starting to not be fun and as it's only a serious hobby (and I enjoy my carbs too much) I think a more sensible approach for me is to try and just balance my diet over the week. If I was an elite athlete looking for additional marginal gains then sure, the periodisation of carb restriction might be a good idea but without a full time nutritionist and chef that might be a little ambitious.


This week saw three main sessions, the first of which was a 30 minute tempo run. I chose to do this on the treadmill given it was so windy outside which would have made keeping a constant pace virtually impossible not to mention how much it would play with my mental fragility if the pace was no where near where I wanted! That said the treadmill has the opposite effect of being highly flattering, in that you don't have any wind resistance to combat.  I set the Treadmill to 18kph which is c5:20mm but I have a footpod which I understand is  more accurate at reading pace than the speed displayed on the Treadmill. The pace for the 30 minute effort came out at 5:09mm (strangely however the footpod data implied I increased pace throughout despite keeping the TM speed constant) which as I say is likely to be highly flattering, but it was a good hard effort that I could have sustained somewhat longer had I needed to. The heart rate was getting up to decent levels by the end of it all though.


The second session was Friday's Fartlek of 3, 6, 9, 9, 6, 3 mins off 2:00 jog recovery. Having woken up to a very thin layer of snow/slush and temperatures very close to zero I again chose to do this session on the Treadmill. For the 3 minute efforts I averaged 4:42 pace allegedly, the 6 minute efforts, 4:48 pace and the 9 minute efforts 5:00 pace. This really did get me wondering how accurate my footpod is so decided to use the next run of the day to calibrate it on a known route's distance. It turns out that the footpod is remarkably accurate so I only had to adjust the calibration factor on the Garmin itself a tiny amount. We shall see what happens next time I run a session on the 'mill. I also decided to do a little bit of reading regarding the impact of wind resistance when running on the TM and it turns out that if running on a 0% incline, which I was then you can pretty much add 15 seconds per mile (at a fast pace) to the pace you recorded for the splits which would make the efforts for this session 4:57, 5:03 and 5:15 for the 3, 6, 9 minute efforts respectively. This is much more in line with what I would expect had I run this session outdoors in good conditions and fit and is pretty much exactly what Mike had wanted me to get close to for the session, so I suspect it was just about a perfect workout! The link above also has some very pretty looking HR graphs for those so inclined! I found a handy chart online which converts paces on the TM to equivalent paces outside based on speed and incline you have the machine set at. Whilst for sessions of this nature it probably makes sense to keep it at 0% incline as getting the legs turning over faster than they otherwise would is probably a good thing for me I do think there's an argument for me to start running my moderate and easy TM runs on a slight incline (perhaps 0.8-1%) to ensure that my aerobic efficiency number is not too positively influenced.


The next session was Sunday's long run which again had  a marathon slant to it. It was to be 18 miles at just under sub 6mm which I achieved quite nicely averaging 5:50s for the run. It did feel hard but then I suppose it would at this stage of the game in the context of quite a big week and only just getting back to proper training.


It was nice to see aerobic efficiency took a big leap forward, more than likely due to an uptick in fitness but also the return of more carbohydrate into my diet!

Ribble Valley 10k - Week 2 of 8

M 9 miles (7:22mm)
T 11 miles HA (6:33mm), 6.5 miles (7:52mm)
W 8 miles HA (6:45mm), 5 miles (7:31mm)
T 9 miles including 12X1min hills, 7 miles (7:58mm)
F 10.5 miles (6:48m), 6 miles (7:30mm)
S 8 miles HA (6:52mm), 5 miles (7:50mm)
S 15.5miles including 4X15mins (5:59mm)

Total 100 miles (6:59mm)
Aerobic efficiency 1024 beats per mile
Weight 143.9lbs Vs 142.8lbs
Body Fat 10.65% (15.32lbs) Vs 11.18% (15.96lbs)
Lean Body Mass 84.75% (121.96lbs) Vs 84.38% (120.5lbs)
Water 64.35%(92.60lbs) Vs 63.55% (90.75lbs)


A brief update for last week as I have been a little short on time!


On the whole, a pleasing week which has seen me get back into triple figures mileage wise and a couple of decent sessions. I did a hill session of 12X1mins on the treadmill on Thursday. Having not done a hill session on the treadmill before I thought a 6% incline would be good and started off at 16kph (c6:00mm) with 90s recovery at 10kph at 0% incline. It became clear that these perhaps weren't hard enough so for 7-9 I upped the pace to 17kph and for 10-12 I upped it again to 18kph. this left me nicely tired at the end. I think it may be a struggle to run a full 12 at the moment at 18kph at 6% incline but that is the plan over the coming weeks. Alternatively next time I do it I may try and go at 18kph but reduce the incline to say 4 or 5%.


The second session was a marathon type session on Sunday of 4X15mins. I find these types of sessions do bring me on quite quickly and I enjoy long sustained effort running, which probably has something to do with me being a marathoner! The paces of the 15 minute efforts came out around 5:30s but they did feel hard and somewhat above current Marathon Pace.


I have been experimenting the past couple of weeks with a relatively low carb diet in the hope of shedding a bit of fat to get down towards the body composition I was pre-Toronto. The result has been that although my overall weight has gone up a touch my body composition has improved with body fat reducing, lean body mass and water increasing. That said I have to admit training in a low carb way has proven to be difficult. Even though I upped the quantity of carbs on the days before this week's sessions, my easy and moderate running has felt noticeably harder and this is reflected in a low aerobic efficiency which has dropped off significantly since my race a few weeks ago. While this may be down to a slight drop in fitness my feeling is that the majority of it is likely to be down to 'training low'. So this coming week I will move to a more typical diet with c50% of calories coming from carbs and see what happens!

Ribble Valley 10k 2017 - Week 1 of 8

M 5 miles (7:02mm), 9 miles including 8 progressive (5:56mm)
T 7 miles HA (7:27mm)
W 9 miles (6:28mm), 3 miles (7:36mm)
T 8 miles HA (7:19mm)
F 10.5 miles (7:17mm), 5 miles (7:44mm)
S 6 miles HA (7:24mm)
S 16 miles including Guy Fawkes 10

Total 80 miles (6:52mm)
Aerobic efficiency 1066 beats per mile
Weight 142.8lbs Vs 138lbs pre Toronto
Body Fat 11.18% (15.96lbs) Vs 8.7% (12.06lbs) pre Toronto
Lean Body Mass 84.38% (120.5lbs) Vs 86.78% (119.75lbs) pre Toronto
Water 63.55% (90.75lbs) Vs 67.8% (93.56 lbs) pre Toronto


After Toronto I took a couple of easy weeks one of which was spent away in Poland for Half-Term. Although I took my kit and hoped to get in a few runs, I only managed two. Unfortunately I didn't manage just two cakes! It was lovely to relax and not do any serious training though by last Monday I was itching to get back into things. I had planned to do the Guy Fawkes 10 at the end of this first week, really as it would be a good way of getting a harder run in without beasting myself in training.


Although my bigger target is London in April, that is too far away to be a focus right now as I want to do a couple of other road races and a XC season before then. With that in mind I have decided that I will have an eight week focus on building to Ribble Valley 10k with a hope that I will finally get something more respectable over the distance!


As one can see from the stats above, it looks like my marathon fitness has deserted me. Aerobic efficiency down by just over 100 beats per mile, body fat up by just under 4lbs! This was to be expected given the post-marathon relaxation and although it can be a little frustrating knowing how fit I was just a few short weeks ago, I know that the fitness (and leanness) will come back quickly too given it is all so recent.


I pretty much took each day as it came with the hope that I would get in around 80 miles with a few bits of faster work. Monday I did a progression run and then on Thursday I did 10X1min with 5 mins tempo which were Ok but I certainly felt rusty!


The plan with Sunday's race really was to just run to feel and not worry about the time or pace.

Photo Credit: Steve Bateson. The Start.

Off we went and I quickly dropped into a group with Jack Wood, Andy Grant, and Ed Hyland. Tristan Learoyd of New Marske had made a very early break and pushed on. I didn't fancy going with that pace as I wanted as pleasant a race experience as I could! I knew from experience that Andy and Jack are very reliable runners when it comes to judging effort so decided to stick with them. By four miles Andy had dropped off a bit and so it was left to me and Jack to try and chase Tristan down. There are some mammoth hills in this race and it was remarkable to see the ease at which Jack would pull away from me on the ascents (he is an accomplished fell runner) but I would then catch him on the descents. Tristan still kept his lead of about 30 seconds until the end of the seventh mile when Jack started to open up an unassailable gap from me. I kept asking myself 'how much do I want it?' I couldn't help it but the answer was always 'not that much!' I also suspected had I tried to go with Jack he would have had something in reserve to continue to pull away so I moved my focus to try and reel Tristan in as he seemed to be tiring. And so he did, I could see that Jack had caught him as we approached the nine mile Mark. So I had one mile to try and close a ten second gap. I worked hard up a couple of undulations and let my legs really go on the downhills. As we approached the dip of a hill with no more than 150 metres to go, I drew alongside Tristan. Now I'm not used to being in a sprint finish, and I certainly wouldn't have confidence in beating anyone ordinarily but I just decided to go for it at that stage and put in a big effort up the final testing hill towards the finish at Ripley Castle and just about managed to snatch second place in 56:16 (not quick but trust me it's a very slow course!). I couldn't help but feel a bit for Tristan as he had run a brave race from the start and had it been a 9 mile race, he almost certainly would have won.

Photo Credit: Steve Bateson. Sprint finish, maybe I did want it after all!

So that's the first week back and the first week done as I build to Ribble Valley 10k on 27th December. Hopefully this week will see an increase in miles and a bit more timber shifting!

Scotiabank Toronto Waterfront Marathon Race Report

Toronto Waterfront Marathon - 11th place in 2:25:46

I said last week that one of the key elements of a good marathon was 'not running like an arse on the day'. Unfortunately I didn't quite take my own advice on board!

The build up as many readers will know went absolutely perfectly, I almost couldn't believe my luck. I arrived on the start line in the shape of my life ready to do some serious damage to the PB. My main concerns ahead of the race had been the forecast 15mph winds which would likely slow me down a touch. As it happened whilst it was a little breezy the wind wasn't really ever a problem. As we were ferried to the start along with the other elite athletes I was chatting to two-time Olympian Krista DuChene who informed me that the humidity would be the big worry and not the wind. It was already 19 degrees at 7:00am and 90% humidity. I wasn't too concerned given all the Heat Acclimation running I had done and didn't think it would effect the outcome time wise too much given the adaptation I had developed. How wrong was I?!?!?

As the hooter went, we were quickly into our stride and I was running in a group alongside England teammates Kevin Rojas, Steve Bayton and Kojo Kyereme. The pace felt quite quick from the start but I knew it was a slight rise for the first couple of kilometres so didn't think too much of it, but what I did notice was that my heart rate was getting to a high level already. The first 5k split my heart rate averaged what I would expect to see as an average for the whole race. I should have taken stock at this stage and realised that I needed to slow down quite a bit to ensure I had a comfortable race. As anyone that has run a marathon and blown up badly will know even if you are going fractionally too quick, the pace still feels OK and it's not like you're busting a lung. So I kept with it. I hoped that things would settle down and it would start to feel easier. It didn't, I felt sluggish, like there was no upper gear and it just gradually got harder until at 20k I started to slow substantially. As a result this meant my heart rate then dipped as I couldn't sustain the pace because of the fatigue in my legs. It was almost as if my Central Nervous System was shutting down and preventing me from running as hard as I wanted. I have subsequently read that humidity can induce fatigue as a defence mechanism to prevent the body from overheating. Goodness knows how slowly I'd have run if I hadn't done all the HA training! Despite all this I didn't feel particularly thirsty at all during the race so that was one element of the HA that definitely worked.


From here, it was just about getting my head down and working as hard as I could to get to the finish in a respectable effort as possible, focusing on trying to pick other runners off in the second half. I thought of all the hard training runs, the sacrifices my family have made to support me in my endeavours, the time Mike Baxter has spent coaching me and how much everyone back home would be cheering me on. This helped me all the way and curb the thoughts of throwing in the towel (I could have done with a towel given how much sweat was saturating my skin, unfortunately given the humidity there was nowhere for it to evaporate!) when it would have been so easy to do so.


At half way I was in 24th and by the finish I was 11th showing how badly the field was decimated by the conditions. Teammates Kevin and Kojo finished in 9th and 10th respectively with Steve Bayton and Carl Ryde valiantly completing the race despite serious issues along the way. To put this all into perspective, there were only two Canadians (one of which was Rio Olympics 10th placer Eric Gillis)ahead of the first England trio and given it was the Canadian National Champs means that we acquitted ourselves well in a high quality field.The strange thing was although I don't feel I could have gone any quicker given how I raced it, I still felt like I could have kept running for quite some distance. That said I was more than happy to stop running when crossing the line!

Photo Credit: Andrew Paterson - Head down with 5k to go.

 

One other aspect that could have affected the outcome was the impact of jetlag. I felt very lightheaded the day before the race and indeed never felt completely fresh in the days following our arrival as well as struggling to get any significant sleep. It is hard to quantify what kind of an impact this could have had on the performance but it is likely to have played a part, even if quite small.

Full stream of the race - I make an appearance when the ladies race winner overtakes me at 40k (around 3hours 3 mins into the video)

The Experience
It would be remiss of me to not discuss some of the other aspects of the experience of racing in Toronto. I was incredibly lucky to get the call up to run for England in this event and am incredibly grateful for the opportunity. The race was arranged as a development event with two main purposes. Firstly rewarding achievement (i.e. how folks had done at the EA marathon champs at London this year or other recent results) and secondly to give the athletes experience of a championship style race and all that goes with it with a view to them possibly going on to compete at major games in the future. Experiencing the travel, staying in the same hotel as all elites, eating together, press conferences, elite athlete briefings, etc.) was just brilliant and I take my hat off to the organisation of the race as well as England Athletics. All things considered it was a great success and I have come away from it with so much more knowledge than I had before. I somewhat naively thought I knew everything there is to know about marathon racing and prep but once more was humbled by the magnificence of the distance. Kevn, Kojo, Steven, Carl and I were joined on the trip by Charlotte Fisher (Team Manager) and RobMcKim (Team Coach) who provided valuable insight and guidance throughout as well as having an incredibly positive post-race debrief where we picked away at what went right and what went wrong. I had such an incredible time on the trip and am so happy I got to meet all involved. It was a sheer privilege. It is also clear that England Athletics are keen to really develop marathoning in the UK and with people like Charlotte and Rob involved I am very excited about mine and my fellow athletes prospects.


What was I worth on the day?
Having now had time to reflect on the race, I don't think I was ever worth quicker than a 2:23 on the day with more sensible pacing given the conditions and course (which I suspect is around 90s slower than Berlin). So to come in with a 2:25:46 is still OK and bearing in mind the humidity could have made 3-4 minutes difference, I was almost certainly in something around 2:18 shape! That may sound like wishful thinking but it seems to make sense to me given the quality of training I had done in the build up.

What will I do differently next time?
Not a lot to be honest, I am very happy with how my build up went and the blend of different types of training which got me to the start feeling primed and ready. I will almost certainly have a near identical build up next time. I do think however I will review my carb loading strategy. I will certainly deplete again but have a more moderate diet in the two-three days before the race with much less carbohydrate than I did prior to this race. I don't think I need as much as the recommended 10-12g per kg b/w per day during the load phase given I do the vast majority of my training fasted and so am quite well adapted to burning fat as fuel.

What next?
I am taking the next couple of weeks easy before getting back into proper training with a couple of 10 mile races planned, including the Northern Champs at Stockport in December. I'll then have a pop at a 10k PB at the Ribble Valley around Christmas before moving my focus to the Cross Country. Marathonwise for 2017 I am currently tossing up Manchester and London. I would quite like to do Manchester and treat it as a race rather than a PB attempt, but I am being drawn back to London given it is the EA champs and I am keen to support that. Hopefully in the not too distant future EA may consider moving the champs to another race, such as Manchester or Yorkshire - two quick and well organised races.